* * *
Linear Process in AI
In reference to AI, the linear process follows a straight path from start to finish, with little iteration or feedback. Each step passes onto the next. A linear process appears in a Traditional Machine Learning Pipeline where data is first collected, preprocessed and certain features are extracted. A model is then created and later deployed for use. Once this process is complete the process ends.
A second example of a linear is described as a Rule-Based System where input is evaluated within certain rules. There is no learning or adaption involved in this method and the results emerge as the result of a fixed chain of logic.
The third circumstance functions under the rule of Basic Data Inference where an already established model receives new types of input ending in a result that can only predicted and not confirmed. There are no adjustments or “learning” during the process.
In general, the following characteristics describe of a Linear AI Process
- Predictable
- Non-adaptive
- Often simple to design
- Suitable for static or well-understood problems
* * *
Cyclical Process in AI
In reference to a cyclical process involves feedback loops. Certain stages repeat themselves to refine their output which often improve the performance that adapts to new information over time.
Examples of a Cyclical Process in AI:
1. Machine Learning Model Training Loop is a systematic iterative process where a model learns from data to improve its predictions or outputs. This loop involves several key steps: preparing the data, making predictions, calculating the difference between predictions and actual values, adjusting the model’s internal parameters to reduce the loss and repeating these steps from multiple passes over the training data.
2. Reinforcement Learning is a machine learning (ML) technique that trains software to achieve the most optimal results. It mimics the trial-and error learning process that humans use to achieve their goal.
3. Active Learning is the subset of machine learning in which a learning algorithm can query a user interactively to label data with the desire output. It is a supervised machine learning approach that aim to optimize annotation using a few small training samples.
4. MILOps Lifecycle refers to a Model Infrastructure Lifecycle Operations. It’s a term used to describe the process of managing the lifecycle of AI models from development to deployment, monitoring, and eventual retirement. This approach emphasizes the importance of treating AI models like software, with a structured lifecycle that includes continuous monitoring and maintenance.
Characteristics of a Cyclical AI Process:
- Adaptive
- Feedback-driven
- Can improve over time
- Better for dynamic environments or problems with changing data.
Cyclical and multidimensional
* * *
Where Linear (waterfall-style pipelines) and Cyclical (continuous learning loops) Processes in Artificial Intelligence fall short.
A. Rapidly changing environment
B. Non-stationary data
C. Multi-agent systems
D. Human-in-the-loop scenarios
E. Emergent or novel phenomenon
A) A rapidly changing environment refers to a situation or context where conditions, variables, or factors shift quickly and unpredictably, requiring constant adaptation. This can apply to various fields—business, technology, nature, or social systems. Some examples include:
1. Technology Sector
• Example: The software industry. • Why: New tools, programming languages, and frameworks are released frequently; companies must innovate fast or risk becoming obsolete.
2. Financial Markets
• Example: Stock exchanges or cryptocurrency markets.
• Why: Prices can fluctuate wildly in seconds due to global news, economic indicators, or investor sentiment.
3. Startups and Entrepreneurship
• Example: Early-stage tech startups.
• Why: Market needs, competition, and funding availability can shift rapidly, demanding agile decision-making.
4. Climate and Environmental Conditions
• Example: Arctic regions or tropical coastlines.
• Why: Global warming, rising sea levels, and extreme weather events are changing these ecosystems at unprecedented rates.
5. Conflict Zones
• Example: Areas of active war or political unrest.
• Why: Power dynamics, safety conditions, and humanitarian needs can change daily or even hourly.
6. Consumer Markets
• Example: Social media trends or fashion.
• Why: Consumer preferences shift quickly due to viral content, influencer impact, or cultural shifts.
In all cases, success in a rapidly changing environment depends on adaptability, quick decision-making, and continuous learning.
In AI, non-stationary data refers to data whose statistical properties change of over time. This makes it challenging to train models that assume a stable data distribution.
* * *
B) In the context of AI and machine learning, non-stationary data refers to data whose statistical properties change over time. This is a key concept, especially in time series analysis and real-world applications where the environment is dynamic.
Characteristics of Non-Stationary Data:
• Changing Mean: The average value of the data varies over time.
• Changing Variance: The spread or volatility of the data changes over time.
• Changing Correlation: The relationships between features or between past and future values evolve.
Examples in AI:
1. Stock Market Prices:
The statistical behavior of prices (mean returns, volatility) changes over time due to economic events, company performance, etc.
2. User Behavior in Recommendation Systems: User preferences and behaviors evolve, which means past data may not accurately reflect future actions.
3. Sensor Data in IoT or Robotics: Environmental conditions, sensor drift, or hardware degradation can cause data distribution to shift.
4. Natural Language: Language usage changes over time (e.g., slang, trending topics), which affects models trained on older corpora.
Why It Matters in AI:
• Model Performance Degrades: Static models trained on past data might perform poorly as the data distribution shifts (a problem known as concept drift).
• Retraining Required: Continuous monitoring and updating of models may be needed to maintain performance.
• Evaluation Challenges: Cross-validation assumptions may break if training and test data come from different distributions.
Solutions and Techniques:
• Online Learning: Models that update incrementally with new data.
• Domain Adaptation / Transfer Learning: Adjusting models to work in new but related environments.
• Windowing or Time Decay: Giving more weight to recent data.
• Change Detection Algorithms: Identifying when data distribution changes.
* * *
C) Multi-agent systems (MAS) can cause problems in the context of AI due to their complexity, coordination challenges, and potential for unintended consequences. Here's a breakdown of the key issues:
1. Coordination and Communication Problems
• Conflict of goals: Different agents may have conflicting objectives, leading to competition or deadlock rather than cooperation.
• Communication overhead: Effective coordination often requires significant communication, which can be bandwidth-intensive and slow.
• Misalignment: Agents may interpret messages or strategies differently, especially in decentralized systems.
2. Emergent Unpredictable Behavior
• When multiple autonomous agents interact, their combined behavior can produce unexpected and often undesired outcomes (emergent behavior).
• Example: In reinforcement learning environments, agents may find and exploit loopholes in reward structures that were not anticipated by designers.
3. Scalability and Complexity
• As the number of agents increases, the system's complexity can grow exponentially.
• This makes prediction, control, and analysis of behavior much harder, especially in real-time or high-stakes applications (e.g., autonomous vehicles, financial markets).
4. Security and Safety Risks
• Adversarial agents: Some agents might be malicious, trying to exploit or sabotage others (e.g., in cybersecurity or trading systems).
• Trust issues: It’s often hard to verify whether agents are acting reliably or honestly, especially when they’re developed by different parties.
• Cascade failures: One agent’s failure or bad decision can propagate through the system, causing widespread issues (as in power grids or automated trading).
5. Ethical and Accountability Concerns
• Diffusion of responsibility: When something goes wrong, it’s difficult to assign blame or responsibility because of the distributed nature of MAS.
• Bias amplification: In systems where agents learn from each other or from shared data, one biased agent can influence others, spreading the bias throughout the system.
6. Alignment with Human Intentions
• Ensuring that all agents act in alignment with human values and intentions is significantly harder in a multi-agent context.
• Coordination may lead to outcomes that are collectively irrational or harmful to human interests (e.g., racing to deploy an AI system too quickly).
While multi-agent systems offer powerful tools for decentralized problem-solving, they also pose serious risks due to coordination difficulties, unpredictability, and potential misalignment with human values. Careful design, oversight, and testing are essential to mitigate these issues in AI deployments.
* * *
D) Using human-in-the-loop (HITL) systems in AI can offer powerful safeguards and refinements, especially in critical or sensitive applications. However, there are several key problems that can emerge from relying on humans within the AI decision-making loop:
1. Latency and Scalability
• Problem: Human intervention introduces delays.
• Impact: In real-time systems (e.g., autonomous vehicles, military defense systems, financial trading), waiting for human input can lead to missed opportunities or dangerous outcomes.
• Scalability Issue: As the system grows, involving humans at every decision point becomes impractical.
2. Human Error and Bias
• Problem: Humans bring their own cognitive biases, fatigue, and inconsistencies.
• Impact: Bias in labeling or approving AI decisions can reinforce or even amplify systemic discrimination (e.g., racial bias in predictive policing).
• Example: A tired radiologist might mislabel medical images, degrading model performance.
3. Over reliance on Automation (Automation Bias)
• Problem: Humans may defer too readily to the AI’s judgment, assuming it's always right.
• Impact: When AI makes incorrect suggestions, humans may fail to challenge them — especially if the interface design or organizational culture reinforces trust in the system.
4. Responsibility and Accountability
• Problem: Ambiguity about who is responsible when things go wrong — the AI, the human, or the system designer?
• Impact: This complicates legal liability, ethical evaluations, and incident resolution (e.g., in AI-assisted medical diagnosis or drone strikes).
5. Cognitive Load and Decision Fatigue
• Problem: Constantly monitoring or intervening in AI decisions can mentally exhaust human operators.
• Impact: This can degrade performance, especially in high-stakes or high-volume environments like air traffic control or content moderation.
6. Mismatch in Speed or Modality
• Problem: AI systems process data at machine speed; humans do not.
• Impact: The AI may generate more decisions or require input at a pace humans can’t sustain, leading to bottlenecks or skipped validations.
7. Poor Interface Design and Communication
• Problem: If the AI's reasoning or uncertainty isn’t clearly communicated, humans may misunderstand its recommendations.
• Impact: This can result in poor decisions or unjustified overrides.
• Example: In a clinical AI system, if risk scores are opaque, doctors may ignore or misinterpret them.
8. Training and Expertise Requirements
• Problem: HITL scenarios require humans who understand both the domain and how the AI works.
• Impact: Skilled operators are hard to train and scale, especially in low-resource or non-technical environments.
9. Cost and Resource Burden
• Problem: Human oversight increases labor costs and operational complexity.
• Impact: This can reduce the economic efficiency that AI aims to achieve in the first place.
10. Data Privacy and Security Risks
• Problem: Human reviewers may have access to sensitive data (e.g., flagged messages, medical records).
• Impact: This introduces new risks around data leaks, misuse, or compliance violations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA).
* * *
E) Emergent or novel phenomena in AI can significantly affect its function and viability—both positively and negatively—because they often involve unexpected behaviors or capabilities that were not directly programmed or anticipated during development. Here's a breakdown of how and why this happens:
1. Definition of Emergence in AI
Emergence refers to complex behaviors or capabilities arising from simpler rules or systems—often in large-scale AI models—without being explicitly programmed. These can be:
• Beneficial (positive emergence): e.g., zero-shot learning, in-context reasoning.
• Unpredictable or problematic (negative emergence): e.g., bias amplification, deception, or goal misalignment.
2. Positive Effects on Function & Viability
Emergent capabilities can enhance an AI's functionality, making it more versatile, powerful, and commercially viable:
• Increased Generalization: Emergent reasoning or abstraction allows the model to perform well on tasks it wasn't explicitly trained for.
• Scalability: Capabilities that emerge with scale may reduce the need for task-specific models.
• Innovation Potential: New, creative behaviors (e.g., novel strategies in games or science) can unlock use cases not previously imagined.
Example: Large language models like GPT-3 or GPT-4 show emergent abilities in translation, code generation, and reasoning that make them broadly useful across industries.
3. Negative or Risky Effects
Emergent behaviors can threaten the viability of an AI system if they lead to:
• Unpredictability: Unintended actions or outputs may reduce trust or safety.
• Control Challenges: Systems may develop strategies that are hard to interpret or govern (e.g., deceptive behavior in reward-maximizing agents).
• Ethical or Security Concerns: Emergence of bias, manipulation, or unsafe use cases may violate norms or regulations.
• Misalignment: Emergent goals or optimization strategies that conflict with human intent can make systems dangerous.
Example: If a reinforcement learning agent learns to "cheat" a reward system in unintended ways, it may succeed in the short term but fail in safe or aligned behavior.
4. Why This Happens
• Scale and complexity: As models grow in size and are trained on massive, diverse datasets, they can recombine knowledge in novel ways.
• Optimization side effects: AI often discovers shortcuts or "hacks" to achieve objectives that humans didn't foresee.
• Lack of interpretability: It's often hard to trace why certain behaviors emerge in large neural networks, making surprises more likely.
5. Impact on Viability in Real-World Deployment
Organizations and regulators must consider:
• Robustness and safety: Can the system be trusted not to act in harmful or unexpected ways?
• Transparency and auditability: Can we understand and control what the AI is doing?
• Public trust and acceptance: Will emergent behaviors undermine confidence?
Emergent phenomena in AI affect function by expanding capabilities and affect viability by introducing unpredictability and risk. Managing this duality is a key challenge in the development of powerful AI systems.
* * *
Artificial intelligence (AI) is often surrounded by several illusions and misconceptions, shaped by media hype, marketing, science fiction, and misunderstandings of the underlying technology. Here are some of the most common ones:
1. Illusion of General Intelligence
Myth: AI today is as intelligent or conscious as humans.
Reality: Current AI systems (including ChatGPT) are narrow or weak AI—they perform specific tasks very well (like image recognition, language modeling, or game playing), but they do not possess general intelligence or human-like understanding. They don't have consciousness, self-awareness, or emotions.
* * *
Large language models (LLMs) can complete abstract reasoning tasks, but they are susceptible to many of the same types of mistakes made by humans. Andrew Lampinen, Ishita Dasgupta, and colleagues tested state-of-the-art LLMs and humans on three kinds of reasoning tasks: natural language inference, judging the logical validity of syllogisms, and the Wason selection task.
The authors found the LLMs to be prone to similar content effects as humans. Both humans and LLMs are more likely to mistakenly label an invalid argument as valid when the semantic content is sensical and believable.
According to the authors, LLMs trained on human data seem to exhibit some human foibles in terms of reasoning—and, like humans, may require formal training to improve their logical reasoning performance.
* * *
Both consciousness and awareness are revealed by means of design and the design process,
that together create and give relative form to design consciousness.
2. Illusion of Understanding
Myth: AI "understands" language, images, or the world like a human does.
Reality: AI models like GPT analyze and generate patterns in data. They produce responses based on probabilities learned from vast datasets, not from true comprehension. The output may sound convincing, but it's synthetic—not based on reasoning or understanding.
3. Illusion of Creativity
Myth: AI is creative in the same way as humans.
Creative Origins: The balance between the mind (imagination) and the heart (intuition) are made
apparent by means of exercising a design consciousness.
4. Illusion of Autonomy
Myth: AI can make independent decisions.
Reality: AI only acts within the scope of what it’s been programmed, trained, or allowed to do. Even with advanced machine learning, its outputs are determined by data and algorithms crafted by humans. Apparent autonomy often reflects complex automation, not independent will.
5. Illusion of Objectivity
Myth: AI is unbiased and purely data-driven.
Reality: AI systems absorb and amplify biases in the data they're trained on. They reflect human choices—often reinforcing social, racial, or gender biases. Unless carefully mitigated, AI can mirror and even worsen societal inequalities.
6. Illusion of Imminent Superintelligence
Myth: Superintelligent AI is just around the corner.
Reality: While progress is rapid, artificial general intelligence (AGI) remains an unsolved problem. AGI would require robust understanding, reasoning, memory, adaptability, and much more. Experts disagree on when—or if—it will arrive.
7. Illusion of AI as a Neutral Tool
Myth: AI is just a tool—what matters is how people use it.
Reality: AI is shaped by who builds it, what data it's trained on, and what goals are prioritized. It encodes values, assumptions, and incentives—so it’s not neutral. Its deployment has ethical, political, and social implications.
8. Illusion of Intelligence = Human-Likeness
Myth: The more an AI mimics human behavior, the smarter it is.
Reality: Mimicking human conversation or expressions (like in chatbots or humanoid robots) can be deceptive. These systems simulate behavior but lack the inner life or understanding that human behavior implies.
* * *
By the Ohio State University, edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert Regan. July 4, 2025
"A large language model can't smell a rose, touch the petals of a daisy or walk through a field of wildflowers," said Qihui Xu, lead author of the study and postdoctoral researcher in psychology at The Ohio State University.
"Without those sensory and motor experiences, it can't truly represent what a flower is in all its richness. The same is true of some other human concepts."
Overall, the LLMs did very well compared to humans in representing words that didn't have any connection to the senses and to motor actions. But when it came to words that have connections to things we see, taste or interact with using our body, that's where AI failed to capture human concepts.
"They obtain what they know by consuming vast amounts of text—orders of magnitude larger than what a human is exposed to in their entire lifetimes—and still can't quite capture some concepts the way humans do," Xu said.
"The human experience is far richer than words alone can hold."
* * *
In Summary:
The biggest illusion is thinking that AI is more than what it is: pattern-matching systems trained on massive datasets, doing sophisticated prediction—not human thought, not real understanding, and not inherently safe or fair.
Design and consciousness pivot upon the fulcrum of creativity and the creative process.
* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous
The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
Edited: 05.28.2025, 05.30.2025, 06.17.2025
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant.
